The Harper's Ferry Tragedy.Austin, Texas, Texas State Gazette [Democratic](5 November 1859)
The bloody tragedy which we have
endeavored to relate in our columns is at least
some evidence of the influence of Black
Republican agitation upon the masses of
the Northern people. The day is evidently
at hand when in the feverish and diseased
state of the public mind of that region on
the subject of slavery, almost any outrage
upon our peace and security, may be
perpetrated, which it is in the power of
madness and folly to conceive. How many
religious fanatics as well as political demagogues
have been connected with this affair
we cannot tell. The disclosures already made
show that the ring-leader Brown, was
supported with money as well as men and
weapons of war by the Black Republicans.
If this imperfect organization and reckless
adventure could command liberal pecuniary
aid and followers, what may yet not be done
when under say some secret society, battalion
after battalion shall be raised and be
speedily despatched into the heart of Maryland
and Virginia? And may there not
be plenty of Peter the Hermits, and Godefroys
to enter the lists of bloody crusaders
against slavery.
The North is active. Her whole people
are being mesmerised in their political
forums, in their churches, at their prayer
meetings, in their schools, at their social
gatherings, in their literary societies --
everywhere by the evil genius of Black
Republicanism. The bronze statue of Webster
was no sooner inaugurated in Massachusetts,
than an organization of New England
preachers took place, and a premium of
$100 was offered for the best tract against
slavery published. These men whom Sam
Houston dignified as the Vicegerents of
Heaven, are by no means regarded with
contempt by the leading citizens of that
United States
Senator arose on that day of their banding
together to co-operate for the purpose of
crushing out slavery in these Southern
States. This was no less than the Hon.
Henry Wilson, the successor of Daniel
Webster, and who is destined to play an
infamous role for posterity. Let us see
what he said. We give an extract from
his speech as reported in the New York
Tribune --
"He (Wilson) looked upon Slavery as the terrible
monster it is. The day was not long distant,
he trusted, that the Church and the country
generally would hold to the sentiment that man can
not hold property in his fellow man. What is
wanted in this country is a deep abhorence of
Slavery -- a sentiment that shall in time extinguish
the terrible evil. He invoked the aid of the money
of the land, but what was most wanted was an
enlightened Christian sentiment against Slavery.
The great duty which we all owe in the Free
States is to blot out all enactments against Freedom.
The first great battle and the first great
victory would be to prevent the existence of
Slavery in the Territories. The Federal
Government might not be able to abolish Slavery in
the States, but the great thing to be done was to
prevent its extension.
"Therefore he would say first give to colored
men all the rights we enjoy; next make our Territories
free; and next, wipe out all enactments in
the States against Freedom. He believed that if
these things were done, the great objects for which
this Society is organized would be accomplished.
If Christian men were true to themselves, a sentiment
would be spread over the nation that
would eventuate in the releasing of four millions
of human beings now in bondage in the country.
He trusted the Society would go on in their good
work, and begged them to be of good courage. --
The Anti-Slavery cause twenty years ago was almost
hopeless. Now its power is immense.--
Whether the church comes to the aid of the Anti-Slavery
cause or not, it would go on. Gen.
Wilson said he welcomed this organization; he should
look toward it with hope. The best men in the
country would bid them God speed in their efforts.
He referred to the time, fifteen years ago, when,
in conjunction with this pastor, the Rev. Mr. Hunt,
he had endeavored to procure such a christian
organization as this without success. When,
therefore, he first heard of its institution, he was
ready at once to bid it God speed as being the
very legitimate agency above all others to accomplish
the Christian work of abolishing Slavery."
These men thus eulogised, are the same
class sustained by Sam Houston in their
impudent demands on the Congress of the
United States. Wilson says -- What is
wanted, is a deep abhorance of slavery -- a
sentiment that will in time extinguish the
evil. Well, the foray on our Southern
frontier springs from this deep abhorrence
of slavery -- it is the outbursting of a
misguided feeling of hostility against men of
the same race and religion, merely because
of our slave institution. Hostility is the
first natural effect of abhorrence of slavery.
A Senator, or a clergyman may talk of
peaceful hostility, but all who know the
nature of the American people also know
that it never can long remain peaceful.
In the New York Tribune we find an
advertisement of a landed company owning
millions of acres in Virginia, Tennessee &c.,
which boldly proclaims it as its design,
to colonize abolitionists in these States.
Hinton R. Helper the notorious
abolitionist who we believe was compelled to
leave North Carolina some two years ago,
is now advertising for 40,000 acres of land
in the western part of that State.
It is not long since that Thayer
attempted to settle a colony of abolitionists
in Western Virginia.
Every evidence of intense excitement
against the Southern institutions is before
us. In all the elections in the free States,
the Black Republicans are triumphant.--
The Republican Governor elected in Iowa,
declared that he would never aid in arresting
a fugitive slave. The Black Republican
candidate for Supreme Judge of Ohio
is pledged against the decision in the Dred
Scott case. The Maine Legislature had
made it a criminal offence to aid in capturing
a fugitive slave. treason against
the Constitution of the United States and
been committed, and these elections have
been tests of the adherence of the people
in their support, and they have sanctioned
them with a cordiality which never
transpired before.
Well what are we to do? Are we to
apostatise to such men as Sam Houston who
have by their truckling to the North, contributed
more than any party to the present
state of things. Are we to endorse him,
after all the Black Republican papers in
the land have rejoiced over his election?
Are we to abandon the citadel of State
rights as enunciated in the Democratic
platform laid down in Cincinnati, Waco and
Houston? Are we to join Winter Davis,
Bates of Wisconsin, and Bell of Tennessee,
in a compromise with these Black Republicans?
Or are we to stand by that old war
worn flag of Democracy, and show to
the North a bold and united front? Show
them that we are alive to the rights of the
South; that we hold our slave institution
as one of the bulwarks of our social fabric,
and any attempt to destroy it as the signal
for the uprising of our whole people in its
defence. Can we sleep at our posts? Can
we give countenance and support to the
men of the South who have been tried and
found wanting? Can we suffer such men
to be put on guard? Never! never! The
Democratic party of Texas has been beaten
but her platform still hangs upon the outer
walls of the citadel, and in another contest
it will fly again over our proud party: We
never surrender.
[<<Previous Editorial][Next Editorial>>]
|