No Title.Frankfort, Kentucky, Commonwealth [Opposition](31 October 1859)
[Pointing Finger] The public are busy conjecturing
whether or not Gov. Wise will demand
from the Executives of Ohio and New
York the bodies of Gerrit Smith, Giddings,
and others, who may be implicated
in the Harper's Ferry affair; and speculations
are indulged as to what will be the
course of those Governors, and as to the
probable results of a refusal on their part
to deliver up such citizens of their respective
States as indictments may be found
against by the Virginia authorities for
aiding and abetting the recent act of invasion of
that Commonwealth. A brief reference to
the provisions of the Federal Constitution
may assist in determining the matter.--
That instrument provides that "any
person charged in any State with treason,
felony, or other crime, who shall flee from
justice, and be found in another State,
shall, on demand of the executive
authority of the State from which he fled, be
delivered up to be removed to the State having
jurisdiction of the crime." This clause
evidently contemplates that the party
charged must have fled out of the State
making the demand, and if this construction
is correct we are at a loss to discover
what constitutional right Gov. Wise would
have to demand, of the Governors of Ohio,
New York, Massachusetts, and other
States, to deliver up citizens of their
respective Commonwealths against whom
indictments might be found by the Virginia
authorities as accessories before the
fact but who were not in Virginia, and
consequently would not have fled from
that State. We very much wish that all
the parties directly or indirectly engaged
in this murderous attempt against the peace
of Virginia and the lives and property of
her citizens, could be tried by a Virginia
jury, so that the strictest justice might be
dealt out to them; but then we cannot see
how this can well be accomplished. And
it really does seem to us that the South,
nor any portion of the South, would be
justified in becoming unreasonably
excited because those Governors may possibly
refuse to do what they manifestly
have no constitutional warrant for doing.
It does not follow, however, that these
men will necessarily escape trial if they
shall not be surrendered to the tender
mercies of Gov. Wise. It is a rule of the
criminal law that a man shall be tried in
the county where the act charged was done
and as Smith, Giddings, et al, are only
charged with having given aid, counsel,
and encouragement to the invasion of
Harper's Ferry, it appears to us that they
may be tried by the State authorities of
New York, Ohio, and other States where
their crime was committed. Or the
Federal Government may take the matter in
hand, and arraign them for aiding, counseling
and encouraging treason and
destruction of the United States property.
We are loath to believe that any Northern
jury, impartially selected, would find these
men not guilty, if sufficient testimony can
be adduced to establish their guilt. The
mass of the anti-slavery men of the North
detest the crime of Brown as heartily as
Southern men do, and would not falter in
doing their duty. They may honestly
believe that slavery not only retards the
material advancement of a country, but is
a great social evil; but they certainly do
not justify murder, arson, rape, and other
necessary concomitants of such a general
servile insurrection as Brown and is
confederates endeavored to excite, but in
which the faithful slaves had no part, and
of which they testified their abhorrence.
[<<Previous Editorial][Next Editorial>>]
|