|
Secession Era Editorials ProjectFurman University Department of History |
|
| HOME > Nebraska Bill >Little Rock, Arkansas, State Gazette and Democrat [Democratic] (3 February 1854) |
|
Senator Douglas -- the Nebraska Bill.Little Rock, Arkansas, State Gazette and Democrat [Democratic](3 February 1854)Last week we published the remarks of this
distinguished gentleman, in connnection with
those of Mr. The speeches of both gentlement were patriotic, as well as frank, fearless and able exposes, of true democratic doctrine. There was, in them, none of that humbug -- none of that clap-trap to catch the popular ear -- which too frequently characterise speeches, even in the Senate. But they eloquently and boldly defended the right, in the face of an overwhelming majority. This week we publish another article from
Senator With the report of the committee, a bill for the Territorial government of Nebraska, is also reported to the Senate, embracing the principles of the compromise of 1850, as follows: 1. That all questions pertaining to slavery in the Territories, and in the new States to be formed therefrom, are to be left to the decision of the people residing therein, by the appropriate representatives, to be chosen by them for that purpose. 2. That "all cases involving title to slaves," an "questions of personal freedom," are referred to the adjudication of the local tribunals, with the right of appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States. 3. That the provision of the constitution of the United States, in respect to fugitives from service, is to be carried into faithful execution in all "the organized Territories" the same as in the States. The substitute for the bill, which your committee have prepared, and which is commended to the favorable action of the Senate, proposes to carry these propositions and principles into practical operation, in the precise language of the compromise measures of 1850. That the free-soilers of the North will oppose the bill may be expected; but if there be any opposition in the South, we are unaware of it. Before the passage of the compromise acts, some of the features of this bill, ought, and probably would have been opposed at the South; but the people of the South are patriotic and law-abiding. They acquiesce in the laws call the compromise acts. They are in favor of the "laws being faithfully executed." They are anxious that agitation should cease. They wish to experience that harmony, and strengthening of the bonds of the Union, which the friends of the compromise promised, and which all good and patriotic men are so anxious to see consummated. We predict for Mr. The bill leaves the settlement of slavery in the Territories and the new States, to be formed, to the people. Who else but the people shall this question be left to? The people of the Territory are alone interested. If they, as citizens of an organized Territory of the U. S.., see fit to establish or authorise the existence of the institution of African slavery, they clearly have the right to do so. If, on the other hand, they prohibit slavery, it is their own concern, and no one can question their right to prohibit it. "All cases involving the titles to slaves," and "questions of personal freedom," are to be settled by the Judiciary; commencing with the local tribunals, with the right of appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States at Washington. This is proper. It is time that the agitating discussions of the slavery question, should be removed from Congress, where it is a most fruitful source of evil, making feuds and heart-burnings among those who should dwell together as brothers; delaying the legitimate business of the nation; at times even endangering the integrity of the constitution itself. The settlement of these questions properly belongs to the judiciary. There is no probability of their being taken, where they could be more justly or impartially settled. The Supreme Court of the United States is the fountain of legal light and intelligence, and we believe it is, and will remain, one of the purest and most incorruptable bodies on earth. That the provisions of the constitution of the United States, in respect to fugitives from service, should be carried into execution in the Territories, is all that the South can ask in that behalf. In that respect, the right to legislate on the subject of slavery, is given to Congress by the constitution; and the duty of Congress to enact, even before the passage of the compromise, the fugitive slave law, can be denied by no man, with a moderate share of intelligence and patriotism. The reasonableness and justness of this proposition, commend it to the good and the patriotic of all parties, both North and South. The Nebraska bill, embodies the principles
of the compromise, so triumphantly endorsed
by the people, in the election of Gen. In the language of the Memphis Appeal,
The abolitionists and slavery agitators, will, of course, oppose it; but, so far as we have an opportunity of observing, they form but a small portion of the present Congress. Their noise, like the hissing of a toothless viper, will be harmless; and tend only to call attention to their own corruption and hideousness. Those who fear the opening of the controversies of 1848-'50, we opine, have not thoroughly examined the subject. We think, on looking at the facts, as they exist, their fears will prove to have been groundless. We think it peculiarly fortunate for the
country, too, that this bill comes before the
Senate with such an advocate as Mr. If the Nebraska bill become a law in its
present shape, and we have reason to believe that
it will, the country will owe a deep and an
additional debt of gratitude to Mr. |