Another thing to note, however, is that you can never know every single minute detail about a given situation. Suppose there was a car wreck and you were a witness. You think is was person A's fault and another witness thinks it was person B's. By listening to many witnesses we can gain a more accurate picture of what happened, but we can never know every single precise intricacy of the wreck. We'll never know how the ant crossing the street saw it or the bird flying overhead. That ant may very well have a key piece of evidence to discovering whose fault it really was, but we'll never hear that evidence. Can you really say that one person has "attained" knowledge while another hasn't? Are we, as fellow flawed humans, in any position to judge another in that way?