On 4/12/02 11:08:00 AM, Eileen Thompson wrote:
>On 4/10/02 3:14:00 PM, Michelle Mc
>Clintick wrote:
>>I do not believe Thompkins got what she
>>had intended on getting from her
>>research paper, but I think she came out
>>with a much bigger picture of truth.
>>She discovered truth sometimes does not
>>exist, and perception does. Thompkins
>>probably intended on just writing a
>>research paper, when really she learned
>>a much more important experience. She
>>was able to learn what truth really is.
>>Maybe Thompkins did not realize at first
>>how much she had learned through her
>>research paper on Indians because she
>>really did not have any information that
>>she knew as truth. However, Thompkins
>>wrote a perfect research paper because
>>it showed many different views.
>
>This is great.
>
OK, Hi its me :)
I have no problem with what you said teacher .... but, I can't imagine that there is something or a subject that has no truth, like she said....that what I was tought about history, that history is a long story that will change according to your thinking .... you can make it sooooo true if you like and you can make sooooo wrong and pointless if want too. and thats what she did, the information she got didn't make any sence to her and she spent the hole essay explaining why she thinks that, which at the end turned to be a great research about what truth really IS ..... :)


the first thing you do when you start falling is to stop falling ;)