Justification lies on a foundation without beliefs
A)Coherentism
B)Foundationalism

Foundationalists:
DesCartes
Locke
Hume
Plato & Aristotle

Empirisist= add things "evident to the senses"
The given- raw interpreted sense experiences which we cannot be mistaken about
"I seem to see red"
"I'm in pain"
challenged as infallible

Advantages to foundationalism:
If it works, seems most certain way of justifying beliefs. Based on something solid.

Coherentism: justification is a feature of a mutually supportive system of beliefs with any perticular belief being justifies by it's role in the system as a whole.