Theological Determinist - God determines vs. Arguments from
god's for knowledge, if god knows what is going to happen. How can you do anything different then what God wanted you to do.
God knows at time 1 that Jones mows at time 2 entails (logically implies) Jones mows at time 2.
Any omniscient being infallible knows the future.
Argument for moral responsibility
Argument for intuition it seems from our (first person) that we are free - before we act there appear to be any number of things we could to.
Richard Taylor/Campbell theories are suppose to go with our experiences not against.
Original position coming into the world is free will until you read something that changes your mind.
Objection: subjective illusion naireview
Burden of proof is on determinism because everything in our experience points to free will.
Deliberation: back and forth in mind when trying to make a decisions (if I do this, If I don't do this) A process for the result.
Free will person says there is influence. Determinism says everything happens from necessity.
Argument Regret:
Freewill.... I really could have told someone how I felt.
If a person regrets things means the have free will.
Determinist people regret things because of their FALSE presupposition of freewill.
Argument: Poor prediction in Psychology and Sociology.
Determinist... Human behaviors are very complex, Psychology is a young science.
Most Determinist are Atheist everything is cause and effect.
Sartre's: "being for itself" and being in itself"
Sartre believes: Radical freedom. We determine who we are and how we interpret the world, identity/ self image and self concept. Meaning of life - how we live.
Things you do in life like occupation is your responsibility.
You may fool yourself into not thinking your free but you are.
Bad faith - acting as if you were a passive inert object. vs. active agent with freedom.
(being for itself) human experience for the world
(being in itself) the world apart form experience.
Perverse freedom - freedom to do whatever you should not do.