Message-ID: <8239366.1182488830378.JavaMail.joeescobar@joe-escobars-computer.local>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:28:25 -0800 (PST)
From: naylore
Reply-To: Online.MC_PO3.LCC-Mail@lanecc.edu
Subject: Re: Joe Re: Fwd: inconsistencies in the grading
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_880_3461346.1182488830377"
GWItemID: 45E2C459.LCC-Mail.MC_PO3.100.1346735.1.355C.1

------=_Part_880_3461346.1182488830377
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=MacRoman
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Hi Joe-

It wasn't a problem before.  It would be great if we could talk.  Would Tue=
sday or Thursday in the afternoon work for you? =20

I've just finished doing some more detective work and I just can't see wher=
e the problem is.

The problem is with the Unit 5 Study Questions scores for my Nutrition for =
Foodservice class CRN 30471.  Of the 36 students who submitted, all but 11 =
had inconsistencies between what the score said when they clicked on the Un=
it 5 Study Questions and what the score said for that one when they went to=
 Grades. =20

You thought the problem might be in the =D2Set Weights=D3, which I never be=
fore fiddled with.  I changed that so the current total equals 100.

I=D5ve attached a spreadsheet which shows the inconsistencies in Unit 5 and=
 it also shows Unit 6 scores, which do NOT have  inconsistencies.  Can you =
see where the problem is?  I=D5ve marked in red the scores that are NOT inc=
onsistent for Unit 5.=20

Thanks for your help.

Beth

>>> Online 02/22/07 2:30 PM >>>
Beth,
We should still probably talk about this.  The way you are trying to show t=
he students' current grade looks like  a problem to me.  I'm doing it diffe=
rently and I am having more success with it.  I'd be glad to meet with you =
in person or over the phone sometime when we can both be looking at the com=
puter screen.

Joe

------=_Part_880_3461346.1182488830377--